Reading 1: What is Globalization - Roland Robertson & Kathleen E. White
1) Summary
The authors are trying to explain the general meaning of
globalization and all of its aspects. They give a broader understanding of
where and when the term originated and how it changed and expanded throughout
the years. They point out that due to all the previous research regarding
globalization, there are already many different views and opinions, and that
these views also differ from one civilization to another. This makes it
difficult to concretely define globalization, especially as there are also so
many different factors and areas to take into consideration.
The authors proceed to nicely break down and explain all
these factors, giving examples and mentioning other researchers and their
views. They discuss the political, cultural, economic and social dimensions and
how they affect globalization, Capitalism and both it’s negative and positive
impact on globalization, and finally, the impact nation-states, individuals,
“international systems” or the current biggest opposing powers, and human
relationships between each other and the world have on our understanding of globalization.
They also discuss glocalization, a combination of the words
globalization and localization. The authors point out that most companies
trying to expand internationally, trying to globalize, will most of the time
have to adapt themselves or whatever they are selling to local cultural norms.
These two concepts shouldn’t be seen as separate but as a whole. It is still
globalization, there are just adjustments in place to ensure the highest rate
of success.
All in all, globalization is, in its simplest form, the
sharing of ideas, culture, values, foods, and anything else, with the rest of
the world in the hopes that they will one day be seen as part of the worldwide
culture instead of only as a small, unknown part of it. The more our world
grows the more this concept too will grow. Until perhaps, one day, the world
will be fully globalized and a proper, set definition will be created.
2) What I learned
I think one of the most interesting points discussed is that
not everyone sees, or understands, globalization in the same way. That people
from 3rd world countries might not have the same ideas of
globalization as people from America or Europe. That the idea that the whole
world is part of our view of globalization is not really accurate as different
countries in varying stages of development, different from the 1st
world countries, might be looked over or left behind. This, as the article
mentions, means there are more views on globalization than just the one the 1st
world countries have, but we just don’t realize as we just assume everyone is
part of this one concept of globalization.
3) Topic for discussion
If we want to get a more unified form of globalization why don’t the 1st world countries, that tend to have more money and resources than the 3rd world countries, use these to help the 3rd world countries develop and grow so they can eventually also be 1st world countries fully ready to share their own cultures and resources with us? Because if all countries are on a similar level when it comes to money, resources, and people, we would minimize inequality between countries and improve equal power distribution, making globalization easier.
Comments
Post a Comment