Reading 2: What is the relation between culture and globalization? Jirky Samyn
Summary
In the
first part of the article, Tomlinson gives us a broad definition of globalization.
He writes that it is a multidimensional process of global connectivity. Multidimensional
means globalization is happening simultaneously in different aspects of society,
such as economy, politics, culture, etc. Global connectivity means that
globalization is a way places around the world can be connected to each other. Globalization
is a newer, still developing, and increasing concept.
In the
second part, he tries to give us a better understanding of culture. He
believes culture is a phenomenon through which people try to find the meaning of life. Culture
makes people take certain actions or make certain decisions. It is important to
know that culture is just a small fraction of globalization. It is one of the
dimensions on which globalization has an effect. But culture also generates and
shapes globalization.
In the
following part of the article, Tomlinson writes about global culture. He
states that globalization will not lead to one unified culture. Looking at the
differences between the developed world and the ‘Third World’ shows that
globalization is an uneven process and therefore not completely global. Contrary
to his beliefs, there are still critics who do believe in a unified global
culture. This phenomenon brings fear for the spread of western culture and
the disappearance of others. Tomlinson writes that using products produced by
big western brands does not take away from your own (not-western) culture. He
firmly states that globalization is just bringing different cultures in contact
with each other, but not at all forcing western culture as the global culture. After
giving a few historical examples of groups and their worldview, he comes to the
conclusion, that the biggest challenge of globalization is to make a unified
culture without forcing one particular culture.
Tomlinson
says deterritorialization is an effect of cultural globalization. It is
the weakening between local culture and territory. Deterritorialization makes
us realize that our own local culture is not the only option in our day-to-day
lives and it broadens our horizons. The writer tries to make us aware of how
telemediatization is influencing our everyday lives and to not take it for
granted. He warns us about the long-term effects of the increasing immediacy in
our modern culture.
In the last
part of the article, Tomlinson raises two problems that are in some way connected
to each other. The dilemma of Universal human rights vs cultural differences
and the formation of cultural identity.
New,
interesting, or unusual items learned
While reading
the article I came across various words that I had not yet learned or heard
about. Some of these were cosmopolitanism, The Mappa Mundi, deterritorialization,
etc. It was also interesting to read Tomlinson’s belief that western culture
is not going to become the global culture or is not taking away other cultures,
because I’ve only heard people say that ‘the west is taking over.' I don’t know
if I agree with his viewpoint, but it is definitely a topic to look into
further.
One question, concern, or discussion
Tomlinson states that one unified global culture will mostly likely never
come to be. If that is the case, where is globalization moving towards, and is
there ever an end?
Comments
Post a Comment