Deadline 3: Political globalization

1. Summary

This article talks about political globalization. First, globalization refers to a multidimensional, accelerated, and interconnected organization of space and time across borders. Politics refers to the way representatives elected by the people who will lead a country or several societies run the country. Combining these, political globalization refers to the addition of globalization politics in which a country may grow or decline.
It largely talks about 'transformation of nationality, nationality, and citizenship', 'change and communication in the public domain', 'importance of civil society', and 'change of space and borders'.
In terms of "transformation of nationality, nationality, and citizenship," politics refers to the changed flow of nationality, nationality, and citizenship as it participates in the global culture. In this transformation, the focus is mainly on negative cases rather than positive results. For example, the political community of the state does not exercise sovereignty over the state, and the state says it has lost much of its sovereignty.
When it comes to 'change and communication in the public domain', it is said that 'communication' is the main fact at the center of politics. It is said that in order to play politics, a window to communicate with the people is needed, and for social influence, a large-scale device of political communication is dominated by political parties. As society and the country develop, globalization accelerates, and corresponding politics is also rapidly being discussed.
In "Importance of Civil Society," civil society is said to symbolize the political potential of globalization. The "civil socialization" of politics refers to the commonality of political forms that connect regions and the world, countries and superstates, and mobilizes various actors around common political codes such as competitiveness, sustainability, personal rights, and social justice. Civil society is not limited, but it shows an international and global pattern following the community, society, and country. And the importance is growing.
In "change of space and borders," it means that borders do not necessarily have a direct impact on territory and country, and are dispersed throughout society. However, I quote 'Valibar' that the re-designation of the border should not be considered just because it has these characteristics and meanings. Moreover, it refers to the scope of political globalization through the creation of various communities and networked globalization (cyber mobility).

2. Interesting things

"Focusing on the connection between new space and new forms has created a perception that space consists of social and political relationships, not just 'given things' that come with territory. Space management is no longer considered an essential element of political construction."

I found the above article interesting. The modern society we live in is really broad. In particular, with the development of the Internet and communication, network connectivity is possible worldwide, allowing communication with anyone anytime, anywhere. In other words, it is a world without physical and limited limitations. Globalization in these societies has become easier.
In the past, there were wars to take over territory, and there were political battles to enjoy greater territory. However, now that globalization in the virtual world and politics in the virtual world are possible, domination of the 'visible space' does not mean much. Therefore, it was interesting to see the articles and contents (categories; changes in space and borders) discussing modern society, where the limited space and management of space were not important in political globalization, and it was important to think and think about new 'something'.

3. Discussion point 

It is said that the social and political worlds are causing a loss of political autonomy. Here, the three processes of 'generalization of democratic models, the beginning of global normative culture, and civil society of governance structure' exist in a complex and contradictory relationship. Each of the three implications for the occurrence of such a complex relationship is discussed.
First, the globalization of the nation-state and its political membership and institutionalized governance model provided. Second, the global normative culture, which was disseminated over a long period of time by INGOs and scripted the development of nation-states in a global form, served as a medium for global personality norms that position the world of individuals maintained by human rights law. Finally, third, the development of multi-core networks, especially global civil society, creates new opportunities for autonomy and awareness of various new actors and new ways of governance, but at the same time can create new instabilities and risks.
As such, political globalization has resulted in a new set of tensions in which politics are currently structured. There are unpredictable conflict processes and consequences, but we need constant implications for what will be right in this situation.