Reading 3: What is the relationship between politics and globalization? (Hyoseung Chae)

Political Globalization

2020055223 HyoseungChae


1. Summary

In the book, the background of the transmission from a nation-centered world to a pluralistic network of governance, the development of a global political culture that works partly to maintain national stability, and the central question fished by political globalization are the extent of division. The social world leads to a loss of political autonomy, when three things summarized as the universalization of nationally embedded democratic models, the beginning of a global normative culture, and the 'civil socialization' of governance are complex and sometimes contradictory. First, nationalist globalization and a model of political membership and institutionalized governance have shaped a universal desire for democracy. Second, the global normative culture, which has been propagated by INGO over a long period of time and adapted the development of nation-states into a global form, has been applied as a background to the global norms of personality assuming the world of individuals supported by human rights law. Third, it is said that the development of pluralistic networks, especially global civil society, creates new opportunities for autonomy and recognizes various new actors and new ways of governance, but at the same time can lead to new instability and risks. Political globalization has resulted in a new set of tensions in which devices are currently structured. While major political conflicts were centered on class division, state-only societies, divisions between traditional and industrial economies, or resistance to imperial rule, supplementary debates revolved around a changed set of interests, individual-to-community, and liberal-democratic versus Cosmo. Political ideas have indeed been applied by political globalization to create the possibility of the spread of places of political conflict over an expanded set of concerns.

2. Interesting Point

Among the parts that have spoken of the new political space and the relationship between borders at the World Congress, it relates to Castels' work, which argues that a network society consists of spaces of place and spaces of flow that exist in tension. In this book, the space of flow refers to 'social practice without geographical proximity', the world of mobility and network connectivity, and the space of place refers to the form of a spatial organization defined in the domain. This section introduces that the emergence of a network society is a sign of the decline of an industrial society, the former depending on the space of the flow and the latter on the place.

3. Discussion Point

Regarding the concept of civil society, it refers to the political sphere between the state and the market where informal politics is conducted for the current purpose. On the global side, this corresponds to a new space independent of global capitalism beyond the realm of state and government. It is said that various kinds of social movements such as international nongovernmental organizations, various organizations, and global civil society movements such as global social forms have formed a global civil society. It is also said that the logic of globalization proves the central logic of political modernity in expressing internal conflicts within the political framework of autonomy versus division. I want to hear other students' opinions related to this.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[Hofstede's dimensions] Comparing South Korea, China & Japan

Hofstede's dimensions_ Comparing South Korea, China, Japan (MINJI JEONG)

Reading Assignment 4: Economic and Globalization -CAI YAYU